Traditional educational approaches have been more concerned with the transmission of knowledge and skills than with the introduction of values and attitudes, or, in other words, with the holistic upbringing of learners “competent for life”. However, already by the end of the 20th century it became clear that education should have a more relevant role in fostering achievement of individuals’ aims and also social and economic welfare. All these created the breeding ground for the emergence of the concept of “competence”. However, for the time being, there is not a unique, distinct definition of “competence”, which makes it scarcely operative and hinders application in educational planning. In this context, competence is being used non-uniformly, and often as a mere declaration of intent, and this is creating ambiguity regarding the design of competence based learning.The onset of the 21st century, coincident with the turn of the millennium, meant a turning point in several areas: education, environment, and economic development among others. Education, thus, appears as central to personal and community development; its mission is to enable learners, without exception, to develop their talents to the full and to realize their creative potential, including responsibility for their own lives and achievement of each individual’s personal aims, but also involvement in one’s social roles at work and in the community.McClelland defined the term competency as, “a sum of knowledge, skills, and aptitudes, which contributes to the capacity of a person to effectively perform the duties and responsibilities of the occupied job; in other words, to be competent”. In this concept, we could look at competencies in three perspectives:Behavioural approach: Competence as a set of abilities that ensure productivity in the labour market. In this approach, with roots in the United States, competences are understood as a demonstration of behavior; i.e., the traits that…